{"id":43833,"date":"2020-06-10T11:49:54","date_gmt":"2020-06-10T03:49:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.imoney.my\/articles\/?p=43833"},"modified":"2020-06-10T11:49:54","modified_gmt":"2020-06-10T03:49:54","slug":"emergency-savings-expenses-salary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.imoney.my\/articles\/emergency-savings-expenses-salary","title":{"rendered":"Should Your Emergency Savings Be Based On Your Expenses Or Salary?"},"content":{"rendered":"
By now you\u2019ve likely heard that you need an emergency savings stockpile that can last at least six months. It\u2019s common for you to be told that it should be able to sustain you for this amount of time should you lose your job, and thus based on your monthly expenses.<\/p>\n
On the other hand, many things can happen over half a year; and having savings that only cover basic expenses may not be enough to deal with unforeseen emergencies.<\/p>\n
So, should your emergency savings be based on your total salary instead?<\/p>\n
Expense based:<\/strong> Quicker goal to achieve, less flexible for emergencies, can allocate resources to other investments<\/p>\n Salary based:<\/strong> Takes longer to achieve, better equipped to deal with unforeseen expenses, may lose out on opportunities for investments<\/p>\n Before we go into this, we should first establish that your decision should be based on your own circumstances. Each option presents its own set of opportunity costs and benefits. It\u2019s really up to you to decide on how you want to go about this.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s an example of how the two options break down. We will assume a person with an income of RM3,000 after deductions. Let\u2019s say this person is following the 50\/30\/20 budgeting rule.<\/p>\n\n The table provides two different options depending on how aggressive you get with your savings. After all, the idea was to allow 30% of your salary for discretionary expenses; after all, you\u2019re not a savage. However, the table also illustrates how much faster you can reach your goal if you can put more in savings in the short term.<\/p>\n You may be wondering why there is a choice to be made; one of these savings targets takes longer than the other and there is no guarantee that you might even need that extra savings.<\/p>\n Well, the idea is that you may want to create a much bigger savings buffer to account for bigger problems. You may not end up out of a job for six months at a time; but if you do, then you had better hope that nothing goes wrong during that time.<\/p>\n This means that your emergency savings can only cover your living expenses and do not take into account anything needing to be replaced or breaking down. So, you would be praying that your car keeps working and you don\u2019t drop your phone.<\/p>\n<\/span>How long does it take to save?<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n\n
\n\t \n<\/th> Expenses-based<\/th> Salary-based<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n\t Expenses (50% of salary)<\/td> RM1,500<\/td> RM1,500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Target savings<\/td> RM9,000<\/td> RM18,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Monthly savings (20% of monthly income)<\/td> RM600<\/td> RM600<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Time to achieve goal with 20% savings<\/td> 15 months<\/td> 30 months<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Monthly savings (50% of monthly income)<\/td> RM1500<\/td> RM1500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Time to achieve goal with 50% savings<\/td> 6 months<\/td> 12 months<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n <\/span>Why base your savings on your salary?<\/span><\/h2>\n